Pages

Friday, January 6, 2012

WHAT ARE YOUR CHANCES OF BEING AUDITED?

The IRS has just released its FISCAL YEAR 2011 ENFORCEMENT AND SERVICE RESULTS.

The total “examination” results are as follows –

Income Under $200,000 = 1.02%

Income $200,000 and higher = 3.93%

Income $1 Million and higher = 12.48%

The number of examinations for those with income under $200,000 is down from the previous fiscal year, but the other two categories are up.

However the number of examinations, or audits, is made up of two components – field audits and correspondence audits.  While the report does not offer any introductory comments or explanation, I assume that the correspondence audit component represents the CP 2000 and similar notices, which are handled my mail or a phone call, while the field audits are the actual office audits.

Looking at the individual components, just under .0023 (less than ¼ of 1%) of taxpayers with income under $200,000 were subject to field audits, and only 1.76% of those with income of $200,000 and higher.

The report did show an increase in field audits in all categories – approximately 29,000 more for under $200,000, 20,000 more for $200,000+, and 4,000 more for $1 Million and over.

I was surprised to learn that correspondence audits were down in the under $200,000 category.  It had seemed to me I was dealing with more CP-2000s than in past years.

So the chances of most of my clients being called for a “sit down” audit at the IRS office is less than ¼ of 1%, as it has been for a while now.

In practice, of the over 10,000 returns I have prepared over the years I can count the number of actual sit down audits I have had to deal with on the fingers of my two hands – so my audit rate is less than 1/10 of 1%.

I would be curious to see the numbers for taxpayers with incomes under $100,000.

Does anyone know if the “income” referred to in the study is gross income, AGI, or net taxable income?

TTFN

1 comment:

  1. I just saw this report myself and found it very interesting. It doesn't specify what they mean by income, but I looked back at some earlier years' reports (2004-2007)that included text and it seemed they were referring to gross income because they were talking about how much taxpayers were earning.

    ReplyDelete