This past
Saturday I was where I have been the same time this year for the past 30+
years, with one or two exceptions. I was
in the audience of the annual “Famous State Tax Seminar” presented by the NJ
chapter of the National Association of Tax Professionals (I was a founding
member of the chapter).
As the title
suggests, this annual “must-attend” event for tax pros who prepare NJ and NY
state tax returns for clients is an update on the changes to state tax law for New
Jersey and New York resident and non-resident taxpayers to prepare us for the
upcoming tax filing season It discusses
individual and business income tax, payroll, sales and inheritance/estate taxes,
the NJ property tax relief programs, and often touches on federal tax changes.
Although I
have officially retired from preparing tax returns, I still write about federal
and state taxes and continue to prepare 1040s and state returns for family and
close personal friends.
Unfortunately,
the seminar was “virtual” again this year – an online “webinar” – due to COVID. Like most of my generation of tax pros (I
started in 1972) I prefer in-person continuing professional education (CPE). Being “virtual” apparently did not substantially
limit participants – it was announced at the beginning of the seminar that more
than 170 tax pros had registered for the event.
It is expected that this event will return to being in-person next
January.
An FYI – my personal
interest in (and attention paid to) CPE topics is limited to issues related to
my specific clients. For the last
several years this has been restricted to individual income tax issues – in this
case NJ-1040 and IT-201 and IT-203 filings.
The webinar
began, as usual, with greetings and opening remarks from NJ-NATP President Josh
Mellum (I like the beard). Followed,
again as usual, by the “keynote” presentation from John Ficara, the Acting
Director of the NJ Division of Taxation (why still “acting”). While I appreciate Mr. Ficara’s support of NJ-NATP
and his willingness to participate in the seminar, this presentation,
thankfully limited to 15 minutes, is usually of little value. However, this year was different, as he
reported on the Division’s operational response to COVID issues. Thankfully, unlike the IRS, the NJDOT did not
shut down in 2020. Employees continued
to work “remotely”. Mr. Ficara announced
NJDOT should return ti full worksite operations during the upcoming tax filing
season.
Next was the
real “meat” of the event – NJ state tax updates presented by members of NJDOT’s
“New Jersey Taxation University”. NJTU
has proven to be the most consistently competent, informed, ethical, and cooperative
component of the Division of Taxation.
Tilesha McCall provided individual updates, Solange Pimental discussed
the state’s Property Tax Relief Programs (Homestead Benefit and Property Tax
Reimbursement), Abra Watson tacked CBT updates (which apparently replaced the sales
tax update presentation that had been listed on the printed seminar agenda),
and Mike Kovacs explained in detail the relatively new NJ BAIT program. BAIT (Business Alternative Income Tax) is New
Jersey’s legal scam to assist NJ taxpayers in evading federal income
tax.
Here are highlights
from the webinar that relate to the 2021 NJ-1040 –
* The initial
filing deadline for the NJ-1040 is the same as that for the federal return –
April 18, 2022. For 2020 returns NJ is
following the IRS on the extended deadline for taxpayers who were affected by
Hurricane Ida – the original January 3rd extended filing deadline
has been further extended to February 15th.
* As in the
past, NJ will not begin to issue refunds for 2021 NJ-1040s until March 3, 2022,
regardless of when the return was filed.
*
COVID-related stimulus, unemployment, “EBT” (Economic Benefit Transfer), PPP
loan, and NJEDA and local grant payments and cancellation of debt continues to not
be subject to NJ state income tax. These
payments are not reported anywhere on the NJ-1040.
* Changes to
the Retirement Income Exclusion (the Pension Exclusion and the Other Retirement
Income Exclusion) for 2021 and beyond have been discussed in a previous TWTP post.
* Changes to
the NJ Child and Dependent Care Credit have been discusses in a previous TWTP post. For 2021 there is no limit on the
amount of the allowable NJ credit – previously the state credit was limited to
$500 or $1,000.
* Changes to
the NJ Earned Income Tax Credit have been discussed in a previous TWTP post.
* As usual,
excess employee contributions to the various state benefit funds resulting from
having more than one employer in 2021 can be claimed as additional state income
tax withholding on the NJ-1040 via Form NJ-2450. The maximum employee contributions for 2021
are:
·
Unemployment
Insurance = $153.85
·
Disability
Insurance = $649.54
·
Family
Leave Insurance = 386.96
There were no
real changes to the Property Tax Relief (aka “Senior Freeze”) program. Here is what you need to know about the 2021 PTR-1
and PTR-2:
The income
limitations are –
·
2020
= 92,969
·
2021
= 94,178
Thankfully,
the 2020 income limit was not reduced to $70,000 by the state legislature to
balance the budget, as had been done in past years (2010 – 2017).
The filing
deadline for the applicable PTR form is October 31, 2022. The application booklets will be sent out in
mid-February and checks will be issued beginning on July 15, 2022.
There was no
change to the application and distribution of the Homestead Benefit.
Unlike in-person
offerings, there was no actual “lunch break” for this webinar. We all had lunch at our desks while continuing
to watch the presentations. As an aside,
the breakfast and lunch offerings at the in-person Famous State Tax Seminars
held at what used to be known as the Woodbridge Hilton, actually in Iselin NJ,
were consistently the best meal offerings of any CPE event I have attended in
my 50 years in “the business”.
The last
NJDOT presentation before leaving New Jersey was a Discussion Panel, new last
year, which is an excellent addition to the seminar agenda (one I had
recommended in past reviews). Christina
Quinones moderated a panel of NJDOT upper management to discuss systemic,
operational and procedural issues. I was
glad the panel once again included NJ-NATP’s old friend Jake Foy (I also liked
his beard). Unfortunately, Jake’s screen
view was fuzzy due to excess light coming from his windows. Another aside – I miss past presenters Alexis
and, of course, John Kelly.
I like that
we could submit questions for the panel prior to the event. As a component of this annual seminar, due to
time constraints, it is, however, important that the seminar planners carefully
review the submitted queries and consolidate similar and related questions to
compose one edited question per specific topic.
Actually,
there would be real value in a separate full-day in-person seminar with two
NJDOT panels – one in the morning to respond to systemic, operational and
procedural issues and another after lunch to answer questions and provide
clarification on actual state tax law.
NJ-NATP Board – are you listening?
The seminar
ended, as it always does, with presentations by veteran tax pro and long-time NJ-NATP
friend, and, like me, honorary member Kathryn Keane, EA of New York.
While having state
tax updates presented by official representatives of the NJDOT is important and
valuable, there is also value in a review and interpretation of updates by an
experienced tax preparer, who can discuss the practical application of tax law
changes.
There is not
much new for the 2021 New York IT-201 and IT-203 forms, except for these items:
* New York
now has a PTET (Pass Through Entity Tax), which is the Empire State’s version
of NJ’s BAIT scam.
* New York continues
to decouple from federal tax law changes.
It currently does not follow the temporary or permanent federal changes
to the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC).
* There is a
new NY Real Property Relief Credit of between $250 and $350 that is calculated
on NY Form IT-229. The NY itemized
deduction for property tax paid that is claimed on IT-196 is reduced by the
amount of the credit claimed on IT-229.
Lately
Kathryn has also given a presentation on federal updates at this seminar, which
I feel is actually unnecessary and not applicable to the event’s purpose. This year’s presentation, titled “Post
Pandemic Practice Management”, provided a different, more practical and
interesting take on federal issues.
KK told us
that, interestingly, the IRS did not see a reduction in Schedule A
mortgage interest deductions as a result of the GOP Tax Act’s elimination of
the deduction for home equity interest.
As I expected taxpayers and tax preparers are not properly complying
with this tax law change (one that I actually support).
And she
reminded us that the $300/$600 non-itemizer deduction for charitable
contributions is for cash contributions only, and does not include
non-cash contributions such as donations of clothes or household items to
Goodwill, the Salvation Army, etc.
There were
minimal technical issues with the virtual offering this year. A “commercial” for one of the event sponsors
ran occasionally during the webinar, replacing the tables manned by sponsors
outside the “classroom” at in-person offerings.
And “Quick Poll” questions popped up throughout the day, a tool to
verify the “attention” and “presence” of the participants for CPE credit
purposes. The results of the polls were
also shown.
There was one
interesting, but not surprising, poll result.
59% of the tax pros “in attendance” still have clients who are waiting
for their 2020 Form 1040 (or 1040-SR) to be processed by the IRS.
The presenters
were, as usual, good and experienced speakers, highly knowledgeable in their
topics. And the presentations were
comprehensive. The true value of this
type of seminar is based on the extent of the changes to state tax law,
regulations and procedures, and, of course, the extent the presentation content
is relevant to a tax pro’s specific practice and clientele. While the value to me personally, considering
the limitations of my specific practice, may not have been especially high, it
is important that the topics I am not interested in be presented at this
seminar each year and the value for the average practitioner, and especially the
newer one, was certainly very high.
I do believe
that it is also important that the seminar content remain primarily true to the
intended purpose of providing updates on changes to state tax law, regulations
and procedures for the current tax filing season. Comprehensive reviews and discussions of
ongoing continuing tax law are topics for other offerings.
Once again
kudos to the NJ-NATP Board, the NJ Taxation University and KK!
FYI – next year’s
Famous State Tax Seminar is scheduled for Saturday, January 14th and
is expected to be, and I sincerely hope it is, an in-person event.
TTFN