Wednesday, February 1, 2012

THE TWELVE DAYS OF TAX SEASON

Now it is time for what you have been waiting a year for - the February 1st tradition here at THE WANDERING TAX PRO of posting “The Twelve Days of Tax Season” -

On the first day of tax season my client gave to me a Closing Statement for the purchase of a home.

On the second day of tax season my client gave to me 2 W-2 forms.


On the third day of tax season my client gave to me 3 mortgage statements.


On the fourth day of tax season my client gave to me 4 Salvation Army receipts.


On the fifth day of tax season my client gave to me 5 Form K-1s.


On the sixth day of tax season my client gave to me 6 1099s for dividends.


On the seventh day of tax season my client gave to me 7 cancelled checks.


On the eighth day of tax season my client gave to me 8 useless items.


On the ninth day of tax season my client gave to me 9 medical bills.


On the tenth day of tax season my client gave to me 10 stock sale confirms.


On the eleventh day of tax season my client gave to me 11 employee business expenses.


On the twelfth day of tax season my client got from me a finished tax return, 11 employee business expenses, 10 stock sale confirms, 9 medical bills, 8 useless items, 7 cancelled checks, 6 1099s for dividends, 5 Form K-1s, 4 Salvation Army receipts, 3 mortgage statements, 2 W-2 forms, and a Closing Statement for the purchase of a home.


And, of course, on the thirteenth day of tax season the client gave to me a corrected Consolidated 1099 from Wells Fargo Advisors!


TTFAW

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

SO LONG, FAREWELL, AUF WIEDERSEHEN, GOOD NIGHT!

Joy to the world - tax season’s here.
I’ll soon be flush with cash!
Let every client be organized,
and give me all I need, and give me all I need,
and give me all I need to prepare their returns!

My 41st tax season will officially begin tomorrow - let the deluge begin!

As is my custom, due to the demands of the filing season I will be taking my annual “tax season hiatus” from posting to THE WANDERING TAX PRO, the NJ TAX PRACTICE BLOG, and THE TAX PROFESSIONAL.

Between now and April 16th I will barely have time to relieve myself let alone blog! I will NOT be answering emails from non-clients, nor will I have time to respond to comments. If a comment requires a response I will do so after April 17th.

A reminder – I am NOT accepting any new 1040 clients (or any other kind of tax preparation clients).  So don’t email me asking if I can prepare your 2011 tax returns. 

I will be publishing a WHERE THE FAKAWI post at least every other week here at TWTP to keep my clients up-to-date on my progress during the season and to report changes or additions to my tax season policies and procedures. Clients can also keep track of my tax season progress by following me at TWITTER (rdftaxpro).

I realize that I am abandoning you at a time when you may need me the most – but I need to make a living!

I find it a bit amusing that the period of time when TWTP gets the most “hits” is during the tax filing season when I am not posting.

“Talk” to you when it is all over!

TTFN

BTW – be sure to stop by tomorrow for the annual posting of my TWELVE DAYS OF TAX SEASON!

Monday, January 30, 2012

WHAT’S THE BUZZ? TELL ME WHAT’S A HAPPENNIN’ - BONUS EDITION

Some last minute BUZZ before my “tax season hiatus” begins -

+ Trish McIntire talks about a certain unnamed “tax chain” in her post “Listening to the Complaints” at OUR TAXING TIMES.

She asks the IRS –

So IRS, are you investigating these offices? It’s your rule; returns can’t be e-filed without the W-2s, W-2Gs and 1099R to back up the income. Are you contacting the taxpayers in the stories to get more info? Are you contacting, or investigating at all, reports from other preparers about tax offices filing with pay stubs? Have you contacted the news outlets with educational materials about filing before the taxpayer has their W-2s and what to do if it happens? Are you running reports for returns rejected because a prior return was filed and looking for trends?

Whatever you do, please avoid using a “tax chain” to prepare your 2011 returns.  Seek out a competent independent preparer.  You will get much better individual service and probably pay less!

+ Speaking of “tax chains” – just got an ad in the mail from Jackson Hewitt that said in big letters “GET $1,500 IN AS LITTLE AS ONE DAY!”.  How? Apply for a Refund Anticipation Loan!

The ad did not say that JH could correctly prepare your federal and state tax returns.  Or that its employees were competent and experienced tax preparers.  Just come in and get $1,500.  It did mention “Free Accuracy Guarantee with paid tax preparation”.  So normally you would have to pay an additional fee if you wanted an accurate return?

They offered a $40 OFF coupon (tax preparation fee only – not good for “financial products, online tax preparation products or other services”).  If that is the discount I can imagine the fee!

Once again – this tax season avoid “tax chains” like the plague!

+ Kelly Phillips Erb, the tax blogoshpere’s TAX GIRL, presents “Tax Trivia Giveaway #1: Top Tax Rates” at FORBES.COM.

The first trivia question is – What was the top income tax rate during World War I?

Do you know the answer?  You could win free tax software!

+ The IRS’s National Taxpayer Advocate, Nina Olsen, has started a blog!  Check out her first post – “Welcome to the National Taxpayer Advocate's Blog”.  We welcome Nina to the “tax blogosphere”!

As Nina says – “So, here’s to the opening of a dialogue about tax administration, taxpayer rights, and taxpayer burden”.

+ And Kay Bell brings us “Tax Carnival #96: Dealing With Tax Dragons” at DON’T MESS WITH TAXES.

I remembered to submit an item this time!  I end the Carnival with "Don't Be In Such A Hurry".  

TTFN

Saturday, January 28, 2012

WHAT’S THE BUZZ? TELL ME WHAT’S A HAPPENNIN’

+ Check out the January issue of LOIS.  

+ My tax tip this week at MAINSTREET.COM was “How to Prepare Your Tax Preparer”.  And then there was “How to Correct an Error on Your W-2”.

+ Go to the MISSOURI TAXGUY blog and look for my Robert F page at the “Store”.

+ The Tax Foundation has issued its “2012 State Business Tax Climate Index”, which presents the tax climate of each state as of July 1, 2011, the first day of the standard 2012 state fiscal year.

The 10 best states in this year’s Index are, from 1 to 10 – Wyoming, South Dakota, Nevada, Alaska, Florida, New Hampshire, Washington, Montana, Texas, and Utah.

The 10 worst states are, from 41 to 50 – Iowa, Maryland, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Minnesota, Rhode Island, Vermont, California, New York, and New Jersey.

Once again, like Oliver Twist the Garden State is last on the list –

“New Jersey scores at the bottom by having the third-worst individual income tax, the fifth-worst sales tax, the 13th-worst corporate tax, and the second-worst property tax.”

+ Darren Mish has a two parter titled “Claim Tax Deductions from your Hobby” at his IRS PROBLEM SOLVER BLOG.  Click on Part 1 and Part 2.


The data showed that 467 employees of the House of Representatives, or about 4.2 percent of the workforce, owed more than $8.5 million. In the Senate, 217 employees, or about 3 percent of the workforce, owed $2.13 million.

Obama’s staff was not immune, either, with 36 people in Obama’s executive office of nearly 1,800 workers — about 2 percent — owing the government $833,970 in back taxes.”

+ Trish McIntire celebrated “Earned Income Awareness Day” (12/27/12) with a discussion of the troublesome fraud magnet known as the Earned Income Tax Credit over at OUR TAXING TIMES.

Trish likes the EITC.  While I may support the basic concept behind the credit, I have written and spoken out against its inclusion in the Tax Code for years.  It is a refundable credit – and refundable credits = rampant fraud.

+ Kay Bell talks about the delays in sending out refunds for early birds in “Tax Refunds Delayed By Fraud Fine-Tuning” at DON’T MESS WITH TAXES.

This will probably be the last BUZZ until after the “tax season”.

TTFN

Friday, January 27, 2012

WHAT'S THE USE?

Just about every state resident tax return now has a line for the taxpayer to enter “Use Tax on Out of State Purchases”.  It is line 44 on the NJ-1040 and line 59 on New York’s IT-201.  Many states require that you make an entry on this line – even if it is 0.00.

The instructions for the 2011 NJ-1040 tell us –

If you were a New Jersey resident and you purchased items or services that were subject to New Jersey sales tax, you are liable for use tax at the rate of 7% of the purchase price {the normal NJ sales tax rate – rdf} if sales tax has not been paid.  If sales tax has been collected out of State, use tax is only due if the tax was paid at a rate less than 7%, based on the difference.”

The instructions provide the following examples –

You purchased a computer for $1,500 from a seller located outside of New Jersey and no sales tax was collected.  Your use tax liability to New Jersey on this item is $105 ($1,500  .07 = $105).

On a trip to Maine you purchased an antique desk for $4,000 and paid Maine sales tax at the rate of 5%. The difference, $80 (2% of the purchase price), is due to New Jersey as use tax.”

If you do not know the exact amount of use tax that you would owe some states will provide an “Estimated Use Tax Chart”.  For example, if your NJ Gross Income is between $75,001 and $100,000 the state suggests you claim $53 in use tax.

I expect that at least 98% of all US taxpayers do not claim any use tax on their state return.  And a great majority of the 2% or less who do are employees of a state tax agency.  In my 40 years in the business I have never had a client voluntarily pay state use tax on their state resident income tax return.

There are those who purposefully shop for big ticket items out of state and have the items shipped to their nonresident address in order to avoid paying state sales tax at the point of purchase.  When this is done the purchaser is liable for use tax on the purchase in his home state.

The at the time Director of the NJ Division of Taxation Robert Thompson told the NJ-NATP annual Famous State Tax Seminar a story several years ago where an attempt to avoid paying sales tax backfired.

The NJ Division of Taxation has had success in sales and use tax enforcement.  In one instance the Division got a hold of the names and addresses of NJ residents who had purchased jewelry from a store just over the border in NY and had the items shipped to their NJ address, and therefore did not pay NYS sales tax.

The NJDOT send a letter, and a use tax bill, to each name on the list.  One of these mailings was opened by the wife of a NJ doctor who thought there was an error on the billing.  The wife called the NJ Division of Taxation and told them –

“You have made a mistake on your billing.  My husband only purchased one diamond bracelet.”

The husband, who apparently purchased matching diamond bracelets for his wife and his mistress, should have paid the sales tax upfront!

If you were a totally honest taxpayer, and in 2011 you did pay use tax on out of state purchases you made, and you choose to deduct state and local sales tax instead of state and local income tax on your 2011 Schedule A, and you elect to deduct the actual tax paid instead of using the optional tables you can also deduct the use tax you paid.  According to the instructions for Schedule A (highlight is mine) –

Generally, you can deduct the actual state and local general sales taxes (including compensating use taxes) you paid in 2011”.  

TTFN

Thursday, January 26, 2012

TAXES AND THE STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS


While I have not yet read it through carefully (nor did I sit through it), there appears to be nothing new on taxes from BO in the State of the Union address.  No mention that I have seen of the need to totally rewrite the mucking fess that is our current Tax Code.  Just more of the same – continue to complicate the Tax Code with more targeted deductions and credits.

The “Buffet Rule” and the general concept of taxing the rich more because they can afford it was one of BO’s themes -

Tax reform should follow the Buffett rule: If you make more than $1 million a year, you should not pay less than 30 percent in taxes. And my Republican friend Tom Coburn is right: Washington should stop subsidizing millionaires. In fact, if you're earning a million dollars a year, you shouldn't get special tax subsidies or deductions. On the other hand, if you make under $250,000 a year, like 98 percent of American families, your taxes shouldn't go up.”

"Millions of Americans who work hard and play by the rules every day deserve a government and a financial system that do the same. It's time to apply the same rules from top to bottom. No bailouts, no handouts, and no copouts. An America built to last insists on responsibility from everybody."

"Do we want to keep these tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans?  Or do we want to keep our investments in everything else, like education and medical research; a strong military and care for our veterans? Because if we're serious about paying down our debt, we can't do both."

Millionaires don’t get the Child Tax Credit, for example, or any of the tuition tax benefits.  Many tax benefits are wiped out based on Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) or Modified Adjusted Gross Income MAGI) well below the $1 Million mark.  Millionaires are taxed on 100% of net capital gains in successful years, but are limited to a deduction of $3,000 in net capital losses in unsuccessful years. 

Millionaires with excessive dividend income pay a lower tax rate on corporate dividends, but only because, due to unfair double-taxation, this income has already been taxed by the federal government on the corporate level as high as 35%.

Does insisting on “responsibility from everybody” mean that almost half of Americans do not have to pay any federal income tax?

And BO calls for the extension of the payroll tax reduction

Right now, our most immediate priority is stopping a tax hike on 160 million working Americans while the recovery is still fragile. People cannot afford losing $40 out of each paycheck this year. There are plenty of ways to get this done. So let's agree right here, right now: No side issues. No drama. Pass the payroll tax cut without delay.”

To be sure, extending this for only 2 months was totally ridiculous, and, as long as it is in place for part of 2012 it should be all or nothing.  But we should also address whether or not this kind of political trick is good tax or financial policy in the first place.

To give BO credit, he does make one good suggestion that I noticed -

Put Americans to work today building the infrastructure of tomorrow.”

And he talks about corporate tax reform – but that is not my interest at this point nor is that the focus of this blog.

TTFN

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

MITT'S 1040

So now we have seen Mitt Romney’s tax return. 

We already knew he was rich – now we know just how rich.

What did Mitt do?  Certainly nothing illegal.  He invested his money for the best return, as you or I would do.  It is just that he has a lot more to invest than we do.

Did he participate in any shady tax dodges or shelters?  Not that I can see.  He invested in stocks and earned a ton of dividends, most of which were taxed at a special rate of 15%.  And he his investments did well – resulting in humungous long-term capital gains.  Did he do anything sneaky to get the special 15% rate?  No. The Tax Code allows for a 15% tax rate for “qualified” dividends and long-term capital gains.  If you or I invested in the same, or similar, stocks we, too, would pay 15% on qualified dividends and long-term gains.  Actually some of us would pay 0% tax on all or part of the and capital gain income.   

Romney also gave close to $3 Million to church and charity, about 1/7 of his AGI, which, being deductible, reduced his taxable income.  Would he have given the same $3 Million away if he did not get a tax deduction?  I think probably so, or at least almost as much.  But the Tax Code allows for a deduction, under both regular tax and the dreaded AMT, for contributions to church and charity.  You and I would get the same tax deduction.

Because he was a victim of the dreaded AMT he got no tax benefit for his substantial state and local income tax and real estate tax payments and his also very high investment expenses. 

He paid $3 Million in income taxes!  More than you or I did.  More than anyone I have ever known did (I believe the most a client of mine has ever paid is a little over $1 Million).  Again about 1/7th of his AGI.  Almost half of Americans either paid absolutely nothing or actually made a profit from filing a tax return.  Should he have paid more tax so a higher percentage could pay 0?  Why?

His return was indeed voluminous – over 200 pages and attachments.  And he filed forms and schedules that I have never even heard of in 40 years in the business, let alone ever prepared.  But they were due to the nature of his investments.

Here is some more info on presidential candidate tax returns -

  The TAX HISTORY PROJECT provides links to the tax returns of Obama and Biden and Romney and Gingrich, as well as those of former Presidents and candidates.

  The WASHINGTON POST compares the basics of the tax returns of BO, Newt and Mitt in “Tales of the 1040s”.

  TAXGIRL Kelly Phillips Erb has reviewed Mitt’s return and tells us “Romney's Tax Returns are Remarkably... Unremarkable”.  I agree with Kelly’s bottom line -

The returns are – as predicted – remarkably unremarkable. Are we okay with moving on now?

TTFN

WHAT’S THE BUZZ? TELL ME WHAT’S A HAPPENNIN’ – WEDNESDAY EDITION


+ Check out the January issue of LOIS.  

+ I suggest you read my NJ TAX PRATICE BLOG post “Everybody Wants To Get Into The Act”.

+ Go to the MISSOURI TAXGUY blog and look for my Robert F page at the “Store”.

+ The WISDOM JOURNAL, by Ron, lists “57 Avoidable Tax Mistakes”.

Ron does a good job in listing mistakes to avoid when preparing your tax return.  However there are some errors.

For one thing, “many of these mistakes are easily avoidable if you use {tax preparation software} to prepare your taxes” is a false statement.  Tax preparation software is no substitute for knowledge of the Tax Code, and certainly no substitute for a competent tax professional.  If you don’t know the tax law you are bound to make these mistakes.

Mistake #10 is very important to note, and provides excellent advice– “Failing to read your entire return to check for accuracy.  It is ultimately up to you to make certain everything is accurate.  Double and triple check your return.”

However the statement “If you use {software} you shouldn’t have this problem” is again totally false.  It is even more important to double and triple check computer generated tax returns!

Mistake #19 is “Failing to correctly handle the ‘Making Work Pay’ tax credit”.  While this was a very frequent mistake on 2009 and 2010 tax returns, you do not have to worry about this on your 2011 Form 1040, as the credit has expired and was not extended.  There is no Making Work Pay credit on the 2011 Form 1040.

And I disagree with #50 – “Failure to use Certified Mail when you mail your return to the IRS”.  Unless you are mailing the return on April 17th and need to guarantee the postmark this is an unnecessary added expense.

+ The INTUIT SMALL BUSINESS BLOG tells us “5 Things You Should Never Say to the IRS” in an audit.

Hey, just because I do not recommend tax preparation software doesn’t mean a blog written by a software company does not have good information.

+ Trish McIntire tells you what has happened if your anticipated refund is reduced by “Debt Offset” at OUR TAXING TIMES.

+ Kay Bell gives us the “2011 and 2012 Tax Rates, Tax Brackets” and discusses marginal vs. effective taxes at DON’T MESS WITH TAXES.

+ And you can “Win 'Your Income Tax 2012'” (from JK Lasser) in Kay’s “No Tax Contests 2012” contest.

If you also feel the urge now and then to go a bit old school with your taxes, leave a comment below on the tax break you find the most confusing.

Or if you prefer, you can tell me via Twitter (I'm @taxtweet) or post your thoughts on Don't Mess With Taxes' Facebook wall.

Whichever communication route you choose, please do so by 8 p.m. Central Time on Friday, Jan. 27. That evening I'll randomly select the winner from all the comments and touch base with him or her about how to send the tax book, via snail mail, to its proud new owner.”

+ Two items regarding the release of Newt’s tax return – Jeanne Sahadi of CNN MONEY goes “Inside Newt Gingrich's Tax Return”, and then there is “Gingrich and Medicare Tax - Pig Maybe - Hog Not - Geithner Definitely Not” from Peter J Reilly at FORBES.COM.

Peter makes an interesting observation (highlight is his) -

What is impressive, given the not shabby 3 mil plus income, is the alimony deduction.  Less than $20,000.  Who is his divorce attorney?  That is someone who should not be wanting for business in the future.”

+ Peter’s FORBES.COM colleague Kelly Phillips Erb, aka the TAXGIRL, quizzes another Republican candidate I never heard of before on his tax policies in “Tax Talk 2012: Tom Miller”.

According to his website Tom Miller is “a 46 year old single dad who has been a career flight attendant for over 23+ years.”

+ William Perez tackles three tax issues that probably generate the most questions in “Differences between Dependents, Head of Household, and Earned Income Credit” at ABOUT.COM-TAX PLANNING: US.

+ And Bill continues the discussion in another item titled “Tips for Resolving Disputes over Dependents”.

+ Trish McIntire provides a good list of the types of income you need to report and the information returns that you (and the IRS) will receive in her post “Income and Their Forms” at OUR TAXING TIMES.

THE FINAL WORD

Newt Gingrich, who led the crusade to impeach Bill Clinton over being serviced by Monica Lewinsky while at the same time he was shagging one of his own interns, thinks that asking a question about his former wife’s contention that he wanted an “open marriage” at a Presidential debate is “despicable”.

While I would agree that one’s marital infidelities should not preclude one from serving as President, it also seems to me that serving your first wife with divorce papers while she was in the hospital recovering from uterine cancer is also a bit despicable.

TTFN