+ It’s here! Check out the October 2011 issue of LOIS.
by yours truly.
+
Nick Kasprack takes a stab at “Fact-Checking Warren Buffett”
at the TAX POLICY
BLOG of the Tax Foundation.
Here
is what Nick has to say (the highlight is mine)–
“The effective rates he claims for other
workers in his office are extraordinary. To me, they seem too high to be
realistic, and I can't figure out how he calculated them, even if you include
all payroll (employee and employer side) taxes. Even if you assume the scenario that leads to
the highest possible tax burden (single filer, no deductions), a taxpayer would have to make at least
$285,388 (in 2010) before his or her effective rate reaches 33 percent.”
As usual, lots of good stuff, and some new
(to me) blogs. I guess I forgot to send
Kay something for this installment due to my previous computer’s diarrhea.
+ And Kay finishes a trifecta with interesting methods some states have instituted to collect back taxes in "Owe California Taxes? Pay Up or Lose Your Driving Privileges".
"On Tuesday Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law a measure that authorizes revocation of the driver's licenses of the Golden State's 1000 most egregious tax debtors unless they set up tax repayment plans with the Franchise Tax Board or State Board of Equalization."
And –
“As
a way to close Maryland's $1.3 billion budget gap, lawmakers there agreed to make driver's licenses and vehicle
registrations contingent on motorists' tax compliance. The bill became law on June 1.”
+ Over at the NEW YORK TIMES site Ron Nixon and Eric Lichtblau make a great point in "In Debt Talks, Divide on What Tax Breaks Are Worth Keeping" (the highlight is mine) -
“Plenty
of lawmakers are against tax breaks and so-called loopholes. Unless,
of course, they personally helped create them.”
And such is the reason why I will
probably never see a truly simple Tax Code in my lifetime.
As Joe points out –
“A
charitable gift annuity (CGA) allows a charitable donor to enjoy a charitable
income tax deduction upon making a gift, while still guaranteeing a stream of
future income payments.”
+
The JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY tells us that the Tax Court has confirmed that “Medical Deduction Allowed for In-Home Personal Care”.
“The Tax Court held that payments made to an
elderly woman’s providers of personal care that she required due to her
diminished capacity qualified as long-term-care services and were therefore
deductible under IRC § 213(d)(1)(C).”
TTFN
No comments:
Post a Comment