In
“Draft Tax Reform Proposals from the Senate Finance Committee” fellow
tax-blogger William Perez from ABOUT.COM tells us –
“Senator Max Baucus, chairman of the Senate
Finance Committee, released three separate drafts of tax reform proposals this {actually
last – rdf} week.
On November 19, Baucus
released proposals for reforming how businesses are taxed on their
international operations.
On November 20, Baucus
released proposals dealing mostly with tax administrative issues.
And on November 21,
Baucus released proposals to reform rules around depreciation.”
William
does an excellent job of listing some of the more interesting of Max’s 72 proposed
changes relating to tax administration. The
proposals cover a wide variety of issues around filing returns, dealing with
identity theft, information reporting, electronic filing, tax collections, due
dates, access to court systems on tax issues, and the sharing tax-return data
among government agencies.
Below
is the list of proposed changes as outlined in William’s post, with my comments on the specific
proposals in bold italics -
Proposals
for Information Returns:
• Proposes
that the deadline for filing Forms W-2 and W-3 with the Social Security
Administration be moved to February 21 (rather than the last day of February
for paper filers and March 31 for electronic filers). Fine with me. I usually have all of mine done by
mid-January the latest. The sooner the
information can got into the federal system the sooner the IRS can match W-2
information to 1040 information. I just
want to be sure the deadline for getting W-2s to taxpayers remains at January
31st.
• Proposes
that information documents (such as 1099 forms) do not need to be corrected if
the error is $25 or less. I don’t
care either way.
• Proposes
that the IRS set up a web site where businesses can prepare and file 1099
forms. This sounds like a good idea to
me. Make it so.
• Proposes
that if a tax return is mailed in on paper and the return was prepared
electronically using software, that the tax return be printed with a scannable
code so that the IRS can process the return more quickly by scanning it in. I do not use tax preparation software, so
this does not affect me. I have no
opinion either way.
• Proposes
to eliminate the $10 minimum threshold for reporting interest income on Form
1099-INT and to require financial institutions to report the existence of
deposit accounts even if no interest was earned. This also sounds good to me. Currently, due to the $10 minimum threshold, many
taxpayers erroneously think that they do not have to report interest income if
it is less than $10.00.
• Would
require additional information be reported on Form 1098 mortgage interest
statement. The additional information would be the outstanding loan balance,
the address of the property, whether the loan was refinanced during the year,
the amount of real estate taxes paid from an escrow account, and the date the
loan originated. Again - sounds good to me. Most 1098s already list the amount of real
estate taxes paid from escrow.
• Would
require insurance companies to report the sale or transfer of life insurance
policies along with the seller's cost basis in the policy. I am not aware of any problem in this area. Don’t insurance companies already issue
1099-R forms with this information if necessary?
• Would
require schools to report only the amount received from students for tuition on
Form 1098-T, rather than the current rules that permit schools to report either
the amount received or the amount billed.
Yes! Yes! Yes! Please! It should report ONLY the amount RECEIVED from
ALL sources (including student loans and scholarships). From this number the amount reported for
scholarships on the 1098-T can be deducted when preparing the tax return. 99% of
Form 1098-Ts that I see each year report only amount billed – so the current 1098-T
is basically as useful as tits on a bull!
Tax
Filing Proposals:
• Would
require businesses and self-employed persons to separate out on their tax
returns income that was reported on a 1099 versus income that was not reported
on a 1099, and similarly to report expenses for which a 1099 was issued and
expenses for which a 1099 wasn't issued. I
guess it couldn’t hurt – although I do not see a real need for this.
• Proposes
new due dates for business returns: partnership returns would be due on March
15th, S-corporation returns would be due on March 30th, and C-corporation
returns would be due on April 15th. I
support anything that will get Form K-1 in the hands of partners/shareholders
earlier. I would make partnership and
sub-S returns due March 15th, and would support extending the filing
date for C-corporations till April 15th.
Proposals
Related to Identity Theft:
• Would
restrict access to the Death Master File.
• Would
direct the IRS to assign a single point of contact for identity theft victims.
• Would
impose new criminal penalties for stealing a person's identity and using that
to file fraudulent tax returns.
• Would
permit Social Security numbers to be truncated on Forms W-2 issued to
employees.
• Would
expand the IRS's access to the National Directory of New Hires database
maintained by the Department of Health and Human Services.
• Would
require the IRS to notify a taxpayer if the IRS suspects the taxpayer's
identity was stolen and used to file a false tax return.
• Would
direct the IRS to study whether the Indentity Protection Personal
Indentification Number program could be expanded to taxpayers other than
identity theft victims.
I
would support anything to help prevent identify theft, and to make resolution
of tax-related problems easier. But I
would want the Social Security number on the W-2 that a client gives me to continue
to contain the complete number.
Proposals
Relevant to Tax Professionals:
• Would
require tax preparers to meet due diligence requirements on tax returns claiming
the child tax credit. No!
No! No! No more unnecessarily excessive “due diligence” requirements for tax
preparers! We are NOT social workers! Better idea – do away with the refundable
Child Tax Credit.
• Would
clarify that the IRS has the authority to regulate tax return preparers. NO! NO!
A millions times NO! Definitely
not!
• Would
require tax preparers to file returns electronically. ONLY if the return can be submitted DIRECTLY to the IRS online
with NO CHARGE to the taxpayer or tax preparer – like the current NJWebFile
system in New Jersey!!! Or ONLY if the
tax preparer uses tax preparation software to prepare returns!!!! A tax preparer MUST NOT be forced to purchase
flawed and expensive software in order to submit returns electronically. I will NEVER use flawed and expensive tax
preparation software to prepare 1040s – and if required to so do by the IRS I
will be forced to retire prematurely.
Proposals
Related to Tax Collections:
• Would
permit the IRS to continuously levy up to 100% of payments by the federal
government to Medicare providers. I
would support this as a way of collecting delinquent taxes from the providers. I would allow the IRS to levy up to 100% of
any payment to any government contractor with outstanding tax debt.
• Would
waive the user fee for setting up an installment agreement if the taxpayer
agrees to pay through automatic withdrawals from a bank account. Sounds good to me. Make it so.
• Would
permit the State Department to revoke or deny passports to persons who owe more
than $50,000 in unpaid federal taxes. NO! I do not support going this far.
Data
Sharing Proposals:
• Would
permit the IRS to share tax return data with the Bureau of Economic Analysis
and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. I do
not see any problem with this.
So
– what do you think about these proposals?
TTFN
3 comments:
Hi Robert,
Always an enjoyable column. One comment about the proposal relevant to tax preparers being required to file tax returns electronically, and your comment that "ONLY if the return can be submitted DIRECTLY to the IRS online with NO CHARGE to the taxpayer or tax preparer – like the current NJWebFile system in New Jersey!!!" I can certainly see where you are coming from and agree to an extent, but are you aware that you CAN in fact submit an online return directly to the IRS with no charge? It is called Free File Fillable forms, and is available on the website www.freefilefillableforms.com. Although the web address might suggest otherwise, it is operated by the IRS, no charge to anyone using it, and your return goes directly to the IRS. I used it myself and didn't have any problems with it.
Have a good Thanksgiving.
CJ-
I had heard of Free File Fillable Forms a few years ago, but also heard that there had been problems with it.
I will try it out with my own 2013 return and see how it works.
Thanks!
TWTP
For electronically filed W-2's & 1099's the due date for filing is extended from the end of Feb. for another month. This is useful if one has the ability to file the forms electronically with your software. On also has to get a separate id number to file the 1099's (and a separate account for W-2's) electronically. -Mike. M www.murraycavanaugh.com
Post a Comment