Click
here to read NAEA President Lonnie Gary, EA’s May 23rd letter to IRS
Commissioner Koskinen about the IRS proposed voluntary annual return preparer
certificate program.
It
appears that the main objection of NAEA to the current IRS proposal is the
replacement of the original initial competency test used in the pre-Loving
mandatory RTRP program with a “50-question
‘knowledge based comprehension test’ to be created by individual CE providers”.
It
goes on to say -
“CE by itself, even in combination with a
‘knowledge based comprehension test’, fails to provide a taxpayer with any
assurance that the person preparing his or her return is even minimally
competent to do so.”
Unlike
the AICPA, the NAEA apparently does support a voluntary designation
program. The letter suggests –
“In the alternative, IRS should consider a
voluntary RTRP program. That program has been vetted thoroughly and has
industry buy-in and the minimum level of rigor necessary to pass muster.”
In
my opinion, required CE “by itself” does not fail to provide a taxpayer with
assurance as to a preparer’s competence.
I believe that the annual CPE requirement is of more value than any
initial competency test. Taking mandatory CPE in taxation suggests that the
preparer remains current with the constant changes to the Tax Code. Considering these constant changes, the
initial competency test an applicant passes today may be at least partially
obsolete a few years down the road.
The
original “initial competency test” given under the mandatory RTRP licensing
program was considered by many to be too easy – especially since it was “open
book”.
I agree that if there is going to be an initial competency test it should be "meaty". My
proposal for a two-tiered voluntary designation program, combining an RTRP and
an EA component (see “What the IRS Should Do About the RTRP"), would call for a
more extensive initial test, with a grandfather exception for experienced
preparers who have taken CPE continually over the years. The current Special Enrollment Exam for
Enrolled Agents would be cut in two – with RTRP-level candidates (tier one)
required to pass the portion of the SEE that applies to general 1040
preparation, and the EA-level candidates (tier two) required to pass the
portions of the SEE dealing with more involved 1040 issues, entity taxes, and
client representation.
What
do you think?
TTFN
No comments:
Post a Comment