Fellow
tax blogger Trish McIntire, of OUR TAXING TIMES, recently gave us an excellent
post titled “No Income is Taxed Alone”.
Trish
was talking about withholding – and the problem that arises when there are
multiple sources of income or couples who both work.
As
Trish points out in her post –
“Withholding is based on that particular
income source; paycheck, IRA distribution or other income.”
If
a spouse fills out a Form W-4 with her employer claiming “Married – 1” the
withholding will be based on the often false assumption that the wages from
which the tax is being withheld is the only source of taxable income.
If
the other spouse does not work, and the couple does not have substantial other
income, the withholding should be sufficient to cover the
tax cost of the wage income.
But
what happens if the other spouse also works, and makes more money, and/or one
or both of the spouses is collecting Social Security or Railroad Retirement, and/or
is self-employed, and/or the couple has a substantial capital gain or
substantial interest and dividend income?
Then the “Married – 1” withholding on the wages will be nowhere near
enough to cover the tax cost of that particular source of income, and the
couple could end up with a huge balance due to Uncle Sam and their resident
state.
But
if the couple also has substantial itemized deductions – state income and real
estate taxes, mortgage interest, charitable contributions, etc – the balance
due will be less.
You
must take all sources of income, and all deductions, into consideration when
deciding what to claim on a federal and state W-4 (while the federal W-2
usually also covers state income tax withholding - you can often file a
separate federal W-2 and state W-4).
As
a general rule I advise my two-income couples to have the spouse with the
smaller wage income claim “Married, but withheld at the higher Single rate –
0”.
Just
what is the tax cost of a particular source of income? You might think it is your marginal tax
rate. If you are in the 25% tax bracket
you would expect that $10,000 of additional income would cost $2,500 in federal
income tax. Or $1,500 if the income is
qualified dividends or long-term capital gains.
But
this is very often not necessarily the case.
Why? Because additional taxable
income will increase your Adjusted Gross Income (AGI), and many tax deductions
and credits are reduced or totally eliminated based on one’s Adjusted Gross
Income or a “Modified” Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI).
Here
are just some of the tax items that are affected by AGI or MAGI –
·
losses
from rental real estate activities,
·
traditional
IRA contributions,
·
the
ability to contribute to a ROTH IRA
·
student
loan interest,
·
qualified
tuition and fees,
·
medical
and dental expenses,
·
casualty
and theft losses,
·
miscellaneous
deductions,
·
the
Credit for Child and Dependent Care Expenses,
·
the
American Opportunity and Lifetime Learning credits,
·
the
Retirement Savings Contributions Credit, and
·
the
Child Tax Credit
And
additional taxable income could increase the amount of Social Security or
Railroad Retirement benefits that are taxed.
An additional $1,000 could increase your taxable income by as much as
$1,850!
And
additional taxable income will increase Alternative Minimum Taxable Income,
which could in turn reduce the exemption allowed under the dreaded AMT. $1,000 in additional income could add $1,250
to income subject to the dreaded AMT.
Even
though we are told that the maximum tax on qualified dividends and long-term
capital gains is 0%, 15%, or 20%, under both the regular tax and the dreaded
AMT, the actual tax cost of additional qualified dividends and long-term
capital gains, under both the regular tax and the dreaded AMT, could be much more
than 0%, 15%, or 20%.
We
certainly know that investment income could be subject to the 3.8% Net
Investment Income Tax (NIIT). SInce
qualified dividends and long-term capital gain are included in investment
income, additional qualified dividends and long-term capital gains could be
taxed at 18.8% or 23.8%.
So
not only is no income taxed alone, but no income is taxed separately, or in a
vacuum.
This
is just more proof of the complexity of the US Tax Code. And of the need for careful year-round tax
planning with the help of a tax professional.
TTFN
No comments:
Post a Comment