Thank God it’s over!
Before I head off to the Jersey shore to
recuperate here is some BUZZ from the last days of the filing season. Hopefully another BUZZ this Friday.
* Duh!
“H&R Block Objects to Report Claiming Tax Prep Chains Target Low-Income Workers”. So ACCOUNTING TODAY
tells us. Of course Henry and Richard
are complaining. But, in my opinion, the
report is truly calling a spade a shovel.
“The
report, from the Progressive Policy Institute, a liberal think tank, found that
workers eligible for the EITC continue to spend fees averaging around $400 at
national tax preparation chains such as Block and Liberty Tax Service.”
The item from Michael Cohn goes on to say –
“In a
recent survey of storefront operations in Baltimore and Washington, D.C., the
researchers found that those eligible for the EITC, who are typically
low-income workers with children, would spend between 13 and 22 percent of
their refund this year at local tax preparation outlets. In Baltimore, where
the average EITC refund is $2,335, the cost to file ranged from $309 at H&R
Block to $509 at Liberty Tax Service. In Washington, D.C., where the average
EITC refund is $2,351, the cost to file ranged from $315 at H&R Block to
$485 at Liberty Tax Service.”
Charging such prices for EITC returns is
certainly unconscionable. I have always
told you that Henry and Richard ain’t cheap!
Of course first off - the Earned Income
Credit, refundable credit and a huge federal welfare program, does not belong
in the Tax Code in the first place.
And second – nobody, especially low-income
taxpayers, should use Henry and Richard or any others of their ilk to have
their tax returns prepared.
The IRS has erroneously turned tax
preparers into Social Workers with excessive due diligence requirements for tax
pros preparing returns with an EITC claim.
This is not our job! The IRS
should provide free tax clinics throughout the US where taxpayers, or usually
tax non-payers, who qualify for the Earned Income Credit can go to have their
returns prepared free of charge by especially trained IRS personnel.
* On April 15th I came across
recently introduced federal legislation that, for the most part, I could
support. The item that brought it to my
attention was “Senator Warren Introduces Bill to Simplify Tax Filing”.
Here is the story (the highlights are mine)
–
“United
States Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) today introduced the Tax Filing
Simplification Act of 2016 to simplify and decrease the costs of the tax filing
process for millions of American taxpayers.
The legislation
introduced today would direct the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to develop a free, online tax preparation and
filing service that taxpayers can use to prepare and file their taxes directly
with the federal government, if they choose to do so, and would prohibit the IRS from entering into
agreements that restrict its ability to provide free online tax preparation or
filing services.”
I have been calling for the IRS to allow
taxpayers to submit their federal tax returns directly to the IRS for free via
the IRS website – similar to the NJWebFile system available to NJ state filers.
Since I do not, and never will, use flawed
and expensive tax preparation software to prepare returns I cannot
electronically file client returns. If
there were “a free, online tax
preparation and filing service that {I} can use to prepare and file . . . taxes
directly with the federal government” I would not need flawed and expensive
software to be able to electronically file returns.
I am not against electronic filing – I
sympathize with the government’s reason for wanting it – I am against being
forced to waste money on commercial software to be able to do so.
I do, however, have some issues with the
legislation provision that will allow “eligible
taxpayers with simple tax situations to choose a new return-free option, which
provides a pre-pared tax return with income tax liability or refund amount
already calculated”. I will explain
why if anyone asks.
* Jason Dinesen continued to post valuable information
during the tax filing season. In “Taxation of Incentives Received from a Bank” he deals with a topic that I became
familiar with very early in my career while still an “apprentice” tax preparer.
* Jason also began a new blog series on “Basics
of Taxes” with “Part 1: Who Has to File”.
* We finish the Dinesen trifecta with the
answer to the question “Does My Partnership Need a New EIN if it Becomes an LLC?”.
* I agree with Christopher Koopman, who
says at THE HILL “Licensing Tax Preparers Won't Help Consumers”.
I do, however, believe that a voluntary
independent, industry-based credential for tax preparers, like a “Certified Tax
Return Preparer”, would help consumers, as I first suggested back in 2013
(click here for my editorial).
In the piece Christopher identifies the
real problem with tax compliance –
“The
issue is larger, and more systemic, than simply trying to ensure that only the
most honest dealers prepare tax returns. It's important to start by asking why
so many individuals turn to others to fill out their forms in the first place.
That answer is simple: The tax code as it stands today is a mammoth, complex
mess. Littered with loopholes, exemptions, credits and other various programs,
the increasing complexity in the code only creates confusion over how to comply.”
The best way to reduce tax fraud is to
rewrite the Tax Code.
* Prof Paul Caron reported “NYU Hosts 7th Annual Tax Movie Night” at TAX PROF. I
would have liked to have been able to attend.
In my experience I have rarely seen the IRS
or an income tax issue portrayed correctly in television episodes, movies, or
plays.
Many, many years ago my mentor and I had
said our tax season experiences would make a good workplace sitcom – but felt
most people would find the episodes based on our reality unbelievable.
* Do you frequently complain about the poor
job being done by the IRS? Here is your
chance to do something about it. In “Think You Can Improve IRS Service? Here's Your Chance” at FORBES.COM Kelly Phillips
Erb tells us –
“The
TAP is federal advisory committee that listens to taxpayers, identifies major
taxpayer concerns, and makes recommendations for improving IRS services. TAP
reports annually to the Secretary of the Treasury, the IRS Commissioner, and
the National Taxpayer Advocate.
TAP
is looking for volunteers to serve a three-year term starting in December 2016.
There are 55 vacancies in total. TAP is specifically looking for volunteers to
serve in the following states: Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado,
Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,
Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, North
Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, South Dakota, Tennessee,
Utah, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Wyoming.”
* Were you following Russ Fox’s series on
“Bozo Tax Tips” at TAXABLE TALK? Click
here for a recap.
* In case you are interested “Sanders Paid $27,653 in 2014 Taxes on Income of $205,271”, and “Obamas Paid 18.7% in Taxes on $436,065 Gross Income in 2015", both from ACCOUNTING TODAY.
THE FINAL WORD-
I was apparently very efficient this tax
filing season – ending with less than half the number of GD extensions than I
had last year! More on “the tax season
that was” in my annual review to be posted next week.
TTFN
No comments:
Post a Comment