Here
are two more inequities in the US Tax Code, which have been made worse by the
GOP Tax Act.
(1) Many
employers have established an “accountable” plan for reimbursing employees for
expenses. If an employee incurs a
legitimate job-related out-of-pocket expense he/she submits proof of payment to
the employer and is reimbursed. However,
others, especially outside commission salesmen, are not reimbursed for the
expenses incurred to generate sales. The
employer pays the employee a draw and a commission based on sales volume. The employee is expected to “eat” his out of
pocket expenses, which could be extensive in terms of business miles, meals and
promotional expenses.
In
the case of the reimbursed employee, his net salary is, in effect, all
“in-pocket”. In the case of the
unreimbursed employee his net “in pocket” is his net salary less his
unreimbursed expenses. The salary of the
unreimbursed employee is usually higher due to the “unreimbursementness”. And there are employers without an
accountable plan who simply provide their employees with a flat monthly
“expense allowance”, or as was the case with municipal police officers and fire
fighters an annual “uniform allowance”, without any documentation
requirement. This expense or uniform
allowance is included in the gross taxable wages of the employee.
Prior
to the GOP Tax Act unreimbursed employee business expenses were allowed as a
Miscellaneous Expense deduction on Schedule A, subject to the 2% of AGI
limitation. So, there was some
relief. But you had to itemize to be
able to deduct expenses and had to reduce expenses by 2% of AGI, so the benefit
was limited. As Miscellaneous Expenses
subject to the 2% of AGI exclusion were not deductible in calculating the
dreaded Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) many taxpayers lost the benefit of this
deduction. And as the gross wages before
deducting any employee business expenses were included in AMT, a multitude of
deductions and credits could be reduced, increasing the taxpayer’s effective
tax.
And
to add insult to injury, the increased
amount of wages paid to unreimbursed employees, and the flat expense or uniform
allowance included in gross taxable wages, are also subject to FICA tax.
Under
the new law employee business expenses are no longer deductible.
So,
both before and after the GOP Tax Act, employees who were not reimbursed for
their legitimate out of pocket expenses via an accountable plan are effectively
paying more tax on their net “in pocket” income than employees who were
reimbursed.
FYI
– back when I started out in “the business”, in the early 1970s, outside
salesmen could deduct their unreimbursed expenses “above the line” (remember – the
“line” is Adjusted Gross Income) as an adjustment to income.
(2) Similarly,
if a person receives a taxable legal award or settlement the gross amount of the award or settlement
is reported as income on Page 1 of the Form 1040 – not the amount received by the beneficiary after legal fees are
deducted. If the award or settlement is
from a claim of unlawful discrimination the legal fees are deducted “above the
line” as an adjustment to income – so their Adjusted Gross Income includes only
the amount they actually receive “in pocket” from the settlement.
In all other cases the legal fees are,
like employee business expenses, deducted as a Miscellaneous Expense on
Schedule A, subject to the 2% of AGI exclusion.
Here the AGI includes the gross award or settlement, so the 2% exclusion
is inflated.
And,
also like with employee business expenses, since Miscellaneous Expenses subject
to the 2% of AGI exclusion are not deductible in calculating the dreaded AMT,
the taxpayer, in most cases, is taxed on the full amount of the award or settlement.
Under
the GOP Tax Act, the legal fees paid on taxable awards and settlements not
related to unlawful discrimination are no longer deductible.
A
taxpayer gets an award of $100,000. His
“contingent” legal fee is 1/3, or $33,333.
So, the taxpayer is only “in pocket” $66,667. If in the new 24% bracket the taxpayer will
pay $24,000 in federal income tax on net income of $66,667 – which is an
effective 36% tax.
TTFN
No comments:
Post a Comment