The titular
character of KISS ME KATE hated men. I hate
K-1s with equal fervor. Especially those
for limited partnership, publicly traded or not, investments. I can live with K-1s for actual business activities,
although they, too, have issues.
All K-1s
usually arrive late – anytime from the end of March to the beginning of
September – more often than not causing the client’s return to be extended. I hate GD extensions just as much as I hate
K-1s (the GD is not "government deferred" or anything similar - it stands for exactly what you think it does).
As limited
partnership investments, again publicly traded or not, are passive activities,
there is added complexity, work, and agita involved in (1) determining whether
or not, and how much of, the various types of income, deductions and losses
from the K-1 are reported on the current Form 1040 and corresponding state tax
return, and the multitude of forms and schedules thereof, (2) keeping track of “suspended”
losses, and (3) keeping track of “outside basis”.
I have
seriously considered telling my clients that I will no longer do tax returns
for individuals who have in their current portfolio limited partnership
investments that produce K-1s. But I
have not.
While I
have not done any specific calculations, I firmly believe that often the additional costs to properly prepare the federal and state income
tax returns for taxpayers with K-1 investments is as much as or more than the
actual income, or tax benefits if any, generated from the investment. If the money invested in these limited
partnerships were instead invested in related mutual funds I expect the
investor would do better. His/her tax
preparation costs would certainly be less.
Of course
brokers never tell their clients this when selling them the investment.
I have no
personal knowledge of this, but I suspect that brokers receive a larger
commission from selling units of limited partnership investments than they do
from selling shares of stock or mutual funds.
I would truly appreciate hearing from anyone “in the know” whether or
not my suspicion is true.
The bottom
line to this post is this – think very carefully before permitting your broker
to purchase a limited partnership investment (unless it is in an IRA account,
which has no reporting requirements). Do
some research to be sure that the income or growth potential of the limited
partnership investment is truly “more better” than a more traditional
investment in stock or mutual fund shares.
Any comments?
TTFN
1 comment:
I have read that if the K1 had Canadian Income, even if invested in an IRA, requires a Canadian return. Pain in the butt for a few hundred dollars of income.
K1's are a pain! But keep me employed.
Post a Comment