To
borrow a quote from an Alan Jay Lerner lyric – “Damn! Damn! Damn! Damn!”. Or, a more contemporary reference – “Oops!
They did it again!”
Kelly
Phillips Erb reports “Despite Complaints, Past Failures & Opportunities For Fraud, {the idiots in} Congress Pushes Private Tax Collection” at FORBES.COM.
“’Those who fail to learn from history are
doomed to repeat it.’ - Winston Churchill
Sometimes it feels
like the government does this best. Failed policies are often recycled – often
many times – in some sort of desperate attempt to make them work. Or to spend
taxpayer dollars to promote self-serving agendas. Sometimes it’s hard to tell
the two apart.”
Kelly
goes on to report –
“The latest attempt to recycle failed
policies is the outsourcing of tax debts to private collectors, an item which
has re-appeared as part of the Highway Trust Fund Bill. Yes, you read that
right. And no, the two really have nothing to do with each other. But this is,
as you know, something that Congress loves to do.”
So,
instead of giving the IRS proper funding for tax administration, the idiots in
Congress would rather give a not unsubstantial piece of outstanding tax
collected to an outside collection agency, verifying once again their status as
idiots.
The government must
not outsource tax collection to private agencies! And
not just because, as Kelly points out (highlights are mine) –
“About 20 years ago, the IRS tried their hand
at using private debt collectors. That lasted a year and was canned amid
complaints about unfair practices and
harassment. Congress made another go at private tax debt collectors during
the George W. Bush administration as part of the American Jobs Creation Act. It
didn’t end happily. That program ‘resulted
in a number of complaints, including one case in which a private debt collector
made 150 calls to the elderly parents of a taxpayer’ even after the
collection agency discovered the taxpayer was no longer at the address.”
And
-
“The 1996-1997 program resulted in a $17 million net loss to the government.
That second go in the mid-2000s? Another loss
of $4.5 million. Those aren’t costs.
They’re losses.”
Why
should the government not outsource tax collection to private agencies?
The
Internal Revenue Service, and state tax agencies, have an ethical, and I
believe legal, obligation to make sure that alleged outstanding debt is properly
and correctly assessed. They have a
fiduciary responsibility to the Nation, or the State, and its taxpayers to be fair, equitable,
and ethical in the administration of tax collection. They must investigate taxpayer claims that debt,
penalties and interest was assessed erroneously.
Outside collection
agencies don’t give a rat’s arse about the legitimacy of an alleged outstanding
tax debt. They
only make money if they collect money, whether the money is actually due or
not. And they will continue to unethically
harass alleged tax delinquents, as they do when collecting alleged private
debts, and as they been proven to have done in prior outsourcing programs.
Kelly
and I are not alone in my opposition to using outside collection agencies.
Linda
Beale, a law professor who teaches tax courses at Wayne State University Law
School and author of the blog A TAXING MATTER, pointed out quite correctly in
October of 2007 that (highlight is mine) “If we would provide the IRS the resources
and personnel to do the debt collection directly, we could collect more money
with less taxpayer cost”, and
posed the question - “If the White House
is so concerned about the inequity of taxpayers avoiding their obligation to
make payment on tax debts, why isn't it lobbying Congress for adequate funding
of IRS enforcement needs?”
National
Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olsen has long opposed the use of outside collection
agencies and criticized the program in place at the time in her January 2008
report to Congress, stating that (highlights are mine) “the
program is falling far short of revenue projections. To date, the costs of the program have exceeded the revenue
the program has generated, and the IRS cannot project when the program will
break even”.
In
2014 she sent a letter to members of the Senate Finance Committee and House
Ways and Means Committee outlining in detail her concerns with using private
collection agencies. Click here to read
her letter.
IRS
Oversight Board chairman Paul Cherecwich, Jr. also wrote to the leaders of the
House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee, stating (highlight, again, is mine) “The concept has already failed twice”,
said “When direct administrative costs
are included, which the Joint Committee on Taxation failed to do, the program
costs more to administer than the revenue retained. We concur with the NTA
{National Taxpayer Advocate – rdf} in
that outsourcing federal debt collection is a bad idea and it makes little
sense to resurrect.’”
The 2014 proposal resulted in objections
from consumer groups and civil rights organizations such as the NAACP, the
National Council of La Raza, the Consumer Federation of America and the
National Consumer Law Center. These groups cited ongoing problems with
overaggressive private debt collectors used to rein in unpaid student loan
debt. Click here to see the letter they sent to lawmakers at the time.
Yesterday Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee ranking Member John Lewis, ranking committee-member Sander Levin, and Budget Committee ranking member Chris Van Hollen issued a statement expressing objections to the use of private collection agencies. Click here to see their statement.
My advice to taxpayers back in 2007 was – “If you receive an IRS Letter 3998-C stating that your account has been referred to an outside agency, write to the IRS and tell them that you refuse to deal with a private collection agency and will only deal directly with the IRS because of your privacy concerns.”
Yesterday Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee ranking Member John Lewis, ranking committee-member Sander Levin, and Budget Committee ranking member Chris Van Hollen issued a statement expressing objections to the use of private collection agencies. Click here to see their statement.
My advice to taxpayers back in 2007 was – “If you receive an IRS Letter 3998-C stating that your account has been referred to an outside agency, write to the IRS and tell them that you refuse to deal with a private collection agency and will only deal directly with the IRS because of your privacy concerns.”
And to taxpayers who received a letter from a collection agency stating that your account has been “outsourced” – “Write to the agency and tell them that you are not permitting them to proceed with your case and you would like them to return any and all information relating to you and your tax situation to the IRS. Send a copy of this letter to the IRS as well." In other words tell the agency you refuse to deal with them and that you will only deal directly with the Internal Revenue Service.
The bottom line – to repeat, The government must not outsource tax collection to private agencies!
TTFN
No comments:
Post a Comment